The Department of Justice (DOJ) is requesting that Edward Kelley, a defendant involved in the January 6-related criminal activities, be sentenced to life in prison, citing his “remorseless” attitude and continued belief in his justification for plotting to kill FBI agents.
Kelley, 35, was convicted last November of conspiracy to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and influencing a federal official by threat.
This conviction stems from his efforts to target FBI agents and other federal employees related to his criminal behavior following the January 6 Capitol riot.
The Case Against Edward Kelley
Kelley, a resident of Maryville, Tennessee, was found guilty in a Tennessee federal court for planning the murder of law enforcement officials. Prosecutors revealed that he compiled a “kill list” of FBI agents and planned “assassination missions” for each target.
These actions occurred while Kelley was under investigation for his role in the January 6 riot, during which he stormed the U.S. Capitol, causing civil disorder, destroying government property, and assaulting officers.
Despite being convicted, Kelley attempted to claim that his case was somehow related to events at the Capitol and sought to have his conviction vacated, hoping that former President Donald Trump’s executive order pardoning rioters would apply to him.
However, his motion was rejected by U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan in March 2024. Judge Varlan determined that Kelley’s criminal actions were not linked to the events of January 6 in any meaningful way, finding no overlap between the crimes charged in his case and the events at the Capitol.
DOJ’s Sentencing Memorandum
In its sentencing memorandum, the DOJ emphasized that Kelley’s criminal actions were “unquestionably serious” and that he has shown no remorse for his plans to murder federal agents.
“The defendant is remorseless,” the DOJ stated, accusing Kelley of continuing to justify his behavior and asserting that he saw himself as a “patriot” in his actions.
The government highlighted Kelley’s ongoing defiance of the law and failure to accept responsibility for his crimes. According to the DOJ, Kelley’s behavior demonstrates an “absence of remorse” and an “undue disrespect for the rule of law,” reinforcing their argument that he poses a continued threat.
They also cited his belief that he was “justified” in targeting law enforcement, further supporting their recommendation for a life sentence.
Kelley’s Defense
Kelley’s defense attorney, Mark Brown, strongly objected to the DOJ’s claims, labeling them as “scandalous and unsubstantiated.” Brown argued that the allegations should not be part of the case, stating that they place Kelley in a “false light” and are irrelevant to the charges.
Despite the defense’s efforts, the DOJ remains firm in its stance that Kelley’s actions are deserving of the harshest possible punishment, asserting that his conduct represents a grave threat to law enforcement and public safety.
A Broader Context: The January 6 Aftermath
Kelley’s case is just one in a series of prosecutions stemming from the events of January 6, 2021. As the DOJ continues to pursue convictions for those involved in the Capitol riot, Kelley’s plot to murder law enforcement officers underscores the violent extremism and dangerous rhetoric that emerged from the attack on the Capitol.
Kelley’s actions demonstrate a clear willingness to act on his beliefs, which authorities view as a serious risk to national security and public safety.
The government continues to call for a life sentence, with the belief that such a sentence is necessary not only for justice but also as a deterrent to others who may be inspired by Kelley’s actions.
A Request for Justice and Deterrence
The DOJ’s request for life imprisonment highlights the seriousness of Kelley’s crimes, his lack of remorse, and his continued belief in his justification for targeting law enforcement.
As the case moves forward, the court will have to weigh the severity of Kelley’s actions and his ongoing threat to society in determining an appropriate sentence.
SOURCE
